Monday, October 28, 2019
Gun Control Essay Example for Free
Gun Control Essay Guns kill many innocent people every year. Some states require permits for guns and some states do not. There are many laws put in to effect to control guns. The main two laws that will be covered in this essay are just and unjust laws when it comes to gun control. (A just law is a man-made code squares with the moral law.) (An unjust law is that is out of harmony with the moral law) meaning that theâ⬠unjust law is not a law at all. â⬠People have always been interested in using weapons for various reasons. The Constitution legally established the right for any law abiding citizen to keep and bear arms, yet proponents of gun control wish to steadily erode this law through regulation and legislation. Some people collect gun as collectors while some use them for protection and others use them for hunting. The term gun control is just that, a steady relentless effort to seize control by chipping away at the edges of the law until is gone entirely. While some people oppose the idea, others claim that the government should introduce tighter gun controls. The first argument of the opponents of strict gun control laws is that most people own guns to protect themselves. They claim that guns are necessary for self-defense because the police are unable to stop violent crime. Opponents further maintain that citizens keep guns to feel safe and defend themselves and their families whenever the need arises. Therefore, gun control laws disarm only the innocent people who obey the laws. Gun laws can protect people while theà same law can get someone injured, due to self-defense. No law should ever be broken because they are here to protect the people, so they say. If everyone abided by this gun law there will be no one in jail for shooting someone. There has to be something out there to help everyone understand the significance of the gun law, but there are always the opposers that make everything hard to understand. How can someone protect their family if theyà cannot have guns, but the enemy ââ¬Å"law breakerâ⬠will get their hands on one and cause harm to someone or even to their self. By not being able to protect their family makes it hard for someone to abide by these gun control laws. Every man should be able to protect their home with a gun as long the guns is kept in a safe place with child proof locks on them. Another argument put forward by people who are against gun-control is that many people keep the guns for sport and recreation. According to the opponents, these gun-owners are responsible citizens who do not intend to harm anyone. They further say that shooting and hunting are sports which many people enjoy, and gun control take firearms from hobbyist and hunters. Hunters are just trying to provide food for their families as a result of the gun law their family might starve. No one ever think about things like that they only think about how someone can be injured or killed when it comes to guns. Shooting sports can be relaxing but the gun law makes them stressful. Guns can really be dangerous when it is put in the hand of the wrong person in wrong in the wrong mind frame; therefor gun laws affect everyone that deals with some sort of guns. Most people think that gun control is absurd due to the fact that everyone doesnââ¬â¢t think the same way. Most sportsmen is against gun control because before the law came about they was able to live free and not worry about the violence these guns was causing. Hunters canââ¬â¢t hang their guns in the back window of their pick-up truck no more due to theà control laws. There should be a background check done for everyone before buying a gun so everyone donââ¬â¢t have to suffer for someone else mistakes. Some hunters think that gun control laws are too stiff. Guns have been around for a long time and really had no restrictions on them now hunters and sportsmen have to pay close attention to these laws so they wonââ¬â¢t go to jail. Hunters think the gun law is unjust, while everyone else thinks it is just. (An unjust law is no law at all) makes it hard to distinguish between a just law. Recreational use for gun can be harmful to if someone is using that gun for the first time. Going to the gun range can be a stress reliever for some people and target practice for others. Needless to say but everyone no matter of age or experience should know the gun law if they going to be using a gun. Although some people oppose gun control law, others supportà the idea because it may reduce the crime and accidental shootings. The reason of gun control law claims that not owning a gun can decrease the homicide that is happing. They assert that most murder victims are killed by firearms. It is also maintained that in robberies and assaults, victims are more likely to die when the criminal is armed with a gun than when he has another weapon. Most rappers rap about killing so if the kids start listening to this music they will start trying to be like the rappers, because young listeners indulge into rap music. A gun can be purchased in my different places and thatââ¬â¢s how kids end up with them. Another reason why people oppose the gun law is because if everyone was able to carry a gun most of these killing by guns would not be happing. People must protect their self at all time because these gun laws can be for or against anyone. Most homicides with guns involved lead to people going to jail because they think they are bigger than the law, people must learn that laws are here to protect citizens. Martin Luther King Jr was killed by a gun and he was a non-violent person. People should be more like Dr. King and use the (non-violent) approach to solve any problem. An unarmed person is prone to a homicide due to the fact they canââ¬â¢t protect them self against an armed individual with a gun. The gun law should help people instead of hurting them. Many crimes can be stopped if the people stop be selfish. Murders happen every day and everywhere but itââ¬â¢s up to the people to stop them or at least decrease the rate of them happening. Guns should only be used by the military at war time but not to kill just to scare. Many people know the law some just think that it is put into effect or pertain to the ones that committing these homicides. The effects of gun control also assert the stricter laws can prevent accidental shooting especially among children. Children have a tendency to play with their parentââ¬â¢s gun because they think it is a toy. Parents should always keep their firearms in a safe with a child proof lock in the trigger well of their gun. If all parents that own guns lock the guns up and keep it away from their kids there would be less school shootings. A lot of youngster can be easily influenced by violent video games and TV shows that promote violence, therefore the gun laws should be tighter. Most youths today rather are out in the streets with theà wrong crowd than at home learning how to prevent homicides or accidental death due to gun control. Kids donââ¬â¢t know right from wrong unless their parents teach them. A lot of kids lost their lives because the parents didnââ¬â¢t know how to secure their guns correctly. The gun law is people should know if they want to own a firearm. In order to reach out and get the attention of the youth there has to be more parents getting involved in their kidsââ¬â¢ lives and teach them about these gun laws if they got gun in their homes. To sum up, the opponents of gun control believe that tighter laws restrict only people who use firearms for self-protection or recreation whereas those who are in favor of gun controlà claim that guns cause more harms than benefits. However, it is obvious that gun ownership is very risky, so it is necessary for the governments to introduce stricter gun laws and educate people about the firearms. With stronger gun control laws, the crime and murder rates will most likely decrease all over the world. Gun donââ¬â¢t kill people it the people who is not gun law educated that kills people. The gun control law was put into effect to help the citizens not to kill off the population, but many people is still getting hurt or kill by someone pulling the trigger on a gun. Works Cited Cohen, Samuel, ââ¬Å"Letter from Birmingham Jailâ⬠50 Essays: A Portable Anthology. 3rd Edition Blackmore, Howard L. ââ¬Å"Guns and Rifles of the Worldâ⬠Firearm Pictorial Works: 1965 Marsh, Pamela C. ââ¬Å"Madison Firearm Dealer Sentencedâ⬠Tallahassee, Florida 30 April 2014. (newspaper) ââ¬Å"Guns Gunsâ⬠April 2013. (magazine)
Saturday, October 26, 2019
Analysis of Edgar Allan Poes The Raven Essay -- Egar Allan Poe Raven
Analysis of Edgar Allan Poe's The Raven Edgar Allan Poeââ¬â¢s ââ¬Å"The Raven,â⬠though parodied, republished, and altered countless times, has withstood the test of time as one of the most recognizable and famous works of poetry in the English language. Carefully measured stanzas with a fascinating rhyme scheme embedded throughout, together with the unique and completely individualistic style of its author, are but a few of the elements that combine to elevate this poem in the public eye. It reaches an as-yet-unparalleled plane of poetic excellence. It is imperative, then, for the reader to understand that the conflict presented in ââ¬Å"The Ravenâ⬠is not the commonly-assumed ââ¬Å"Man vs. Animal,â⬠as though to embody the plight of the man as he pits himself against the inexorable and daunting raven who crouches before him, but rather ââ¬Å"Man vs. Himself.â⬠Unfortunately, a sad mistake is predominantly concluded upon by the public at large as they study this piece. Many readers view the titular character as being the sinister, twisted daemon sent from hell to torment its host. This, while at a preliminary reading may appear to be the case, is not the theory widely accepted both by scholars and serious contemporary students. The repeated negative answer is not a warning, prophecy, or ill-spoken omen. The bird is no oracle. Poe himself tells us that the creatureââ¬â¢s ââ¬Å" ââ¬Ëonly stock and store, / Caught from some unhappy master whom unmerciful disasterâ⬠/ Followed fast and followed faster till his songs one burden bore- / Till the dirges of his Hope that melancholy burden boreââ¬â¢ â⬠is, in fact, ââ¬Å" ââ¬Ë ââ¬Å"Never- nevermoreâ⬠ââ¬â¢Ã¢â¬ (62-66). It is interesting to note that Poe originally postulated placing a parrot in this role, but opted for a raven as ââ¬Å"equally ... ...eming of a demonââ¬â¢s that is dreaming, And the lamplight oââ¬â¢er him streaming throws his shadow on the floor; And my soul from out that shadow that lies floating on the floor Shall be lifted- nevermore! This work deftly captures the inward and hidden desire that all men and women face in the maelstrom of grief that accompanies the death of their true love. As has been noted, it is not the raven that carries with it the agony. The raven is merely the catalyst, acting upon the pent-up agony that already exists within the bosom of the narrator. Here we find true, seldom-revealed human nature in striking clarity. ââ¬Å"The Ravenâ⬠is as timeless as it is human, and as long as lovers love and the living die, it will remain a horrifyingly accurate representation of life as many would not care to admit. Therein lies its strength, and therein lies its beauty.
Thursday, October 24, 2019
Misrepresentation and the Ethical Decision to ââ¬ÅEmbellishââ¬Â
Applying for a job is one of the most challenging processes most adults have to undertake. It generally requires an individual to display his or her best qualities in order to create a lasting impression that would make an employer convinced that he or she is right and qualified for the desired job. However, there are times when people get desperate for a job, its high-paying salary, and benefits that misrepresentation in job applications takes place. This is a common practice experienced by employers.This act of false presentation of the self through resumes and personal interviews can theoretically be explained by the psychological idea of establishing a social identity. This social identity that an individual creates is bound to represent him or her in front of the social environment where he or she belongs. In this process of building a social identity or social ââ¬Å"self,â⬠an individual creates a concept of a ââ¬Å"frontâ⬠which Erving Goffman describes as oneâ⬠â¢s representation of performance that can be judged by others depending on the how pleasant and how well-represented the front is (cited in Barnhart, 1994).It may include writing falsely about oneââ¬â¢s personal job experience (writing better ones even though the person did really have such experiences), about awards and honors, and even about oneââ¬â¢s personal identity. One can easily understand the logic behind the practice of misrepresenting oneself with made-up experiences, achievements, and identityââ¬âpeople do this in order to present themselves in the best way possible and obtain their dream job.However, this act of embellishing oneââ¬â¢s resume or profile to make it more appealing to the eyes of the employer also involves several risks. Aside from the possibility that one might get caught immediately and lose the chance of being interviewed, embellishing resumes can also cause him or her to lose his or her job during the time when the person is already worki ng and loving his or her job. In addition to this, misrepresenting oneself may also lead to a damaged reputation (Safani, 2008).Credibility and honesty are two of the most important values an employer always seeks from job applicants. These values do not just build trust but also assures the employers and the company that their members and staff do not have any tendencies of committing fraudulent acts which can possibly involve the company in the future. Thus, the building of trust and confidence between an employer and a future employee starts in the process of application.An applicantââ¬â¢s credibility shall be first tested at that moment when the application requirements have been passed and the employer checks on the requirements to know about the applicant. Hence, this is the crucial time to build up oneââ¬â¢s self in a legal, truthful way to be able to develop and maintain that confidence and reputation. In turn, this will enhance a personââ¬â¢s employment history whi ch can further help him or her in future job applications
Wednesday, October 23, 2019
Characteristics of Maggie and Don in the Rainbow Bird Essay
Maggie is a nature-lover & fascinated by nature. Instead of paying attention in class, Maggieââ¬â¢s mind ââ¬Å"had been filled with a vision of the bird.â⬠This clearly shows that she is so enthralled by the rainbow bird that she cannot concentrate in class. From what her mother said, ââ¬Å"Itââ¬â¢s a bird nowâ⬠, I can infer that she may have other interests before. In school, she carried ââ¬Å"beetlesââ¬â¢ wings and cowriesâ⬠about in her desk ââ¬Å"to stare atâ⬠and this shows that she is a person who loves nature. Her love for nature is also evident in the way she reacts when she finds out that the Honey Man killed the rainbow bird and its family. Her anger and sorrow reveal how much the bird means to her. She is secretive, loner and is misunderstood by others. Maggie refuses to let her friends know about ââ¬Å"her secretâ⬠about the rainbow bird. She is afraid that if they find out about the rainbow bird, they will start teasing and making fun of her. Maggie is very emotional, sensitive and revengeful. Upon hearing about the rainbow birdââ¬â¢s death, Maggie ââ¬Å"lets herself get worked upâ⬠and started to curse the Honey Man. This is evident in ââ¬Å"He will die. I know he will.. Serve him right, tooâ⬠She hates the Honey Man so much that she describes him as a ââ¬Å"devilâ⬠and a ââ¬Å"beastâ⬠and wished that ââ¬Å"forked lightning would leaped out of the sky and char him to ashes.â⬠This clearly shows that Maggie holds a grudge against the Honey Man and is revengeful. Maggie immediately questioned the Honey Man, ââ¬Å"Whatââ¬â¢re you doing with that gun?â⬠This shows that Maggie is very straightforward and rude because she did not greet the Honey Man when she saw him. Immediately after school, Maggie ââ¬Å"raced downâ⬠constantly urging Don to hurry up. This shows that she is anxious to meet the rainbow bird and impatient. She told Don to ââ¬Å"chuckâ⬠the bird away and Don ââ¬Å"obeyedâ⬠her. Maggie was able to make Don listen to her and able to control Don. Maggie could identify that it was Cafferty the Honey Man who was the ââ¬Å"big, dark figureâ⬠on the slope. She could see a ââ¬Å"lumpâ⬠in his pocket. Maggie watched the Honey Manââ¬â¢s every move and is therefore observant. Even though the rainbow bird is dead, Maggie is still hating the Honey Man that he killed the bird. She also thought that the people were ââ¬Å"burying the rainbow birdâ⬠. This shows that she is unrealistic and was still thinking about the rainbow bird. Maggie is imaginative. Although the rainbow bird is dead, Maggie is trying to ââ¬Å"imagineâ⬠the rainbow bird and thought that the people were ââ¬Å"burying the rainbow birdâ⬠. This shows that Maggie is very imaginative. Upon hearing that the Honey Man is charging ââ¬Å"six-penceâ⬠for every rainbow bird, Don planned to go hunting for rainbow birds with other boys. He was not on his sisterââ¬â¢s side and wanted to kill the rainbow birds for money. This shows that Don is greedy. Don ââ¬Å"obeyedâ⬠his sister and ââ¬Å"chuckâ⬠the rainbow bird away. Don wanted to â⬠feel if there were any little onesâ⬠in the nest without considering that the mother bird would go away. He did not know that there was someone near the nest and was about to go on but Maggie stopped him. This clearly shows that he is rash, and do things without thinking. Even though the rainbow is dead, Don ââ¬Å"pretended he did not careâ⬠and did not console his sister. He did not feel sad when the rainbow bird is dead. This shows that he is unfeeling and cruel.
Tuesday, October 22, 2019
The history of Dubbing in France
The history of Dubbing in France Economic issues Dominance of dubbing in the French film industry has been there for the past six decades. This translation technique requires an expert to match the actorââ¬â¢s dialogue with lips synchrony, a factor that has economic effect on both the small and medium distributors in the industry. Hiring such experts would be hugely expensive for these small and medium distributors like what Joinville studios experienced (Christine 2004, p. 208).Advertising We will write a custom research paper sample on The history of Dubbing in France specifically for you for only $16.05 $11/page Learn More Major distributors have dominated the industry because their bulk production does not incur a lot of cost when dubbing (Dana 1991, p. 607). The expense for producing a dubbed film is 10 times higher than any other translational technique; these producers can only afford this form. Preferences for dubbed films have driven many filmmakers to acclimatize to their marke t demands by embracing dubbing as opposed to subtitling (Bogucki 2004, p. 71). A tradition by French citizens to hold firmly onto dubbing has done little to embrace translational change. It is true that any abrupt change without both technological considerations as well as market survey would mean economic woes to dubbing industry just like what subtitling companies in Europe went through before the version could, became attractive to local companies (Riggio 2010, p. 31). Dubbing has in turn created a few job opportunities for the actors doing voice translation. A survey carried out by European commission (2007, p. 1) inextricably linked economic down trend with dubbing by arguing that citizens from nations like France who grew up in a culture without diversity lack English skills to land them considerable contracts because dubbing neither promote English language development nor cultural diversity (Cattrysse 2004, p. 39). Social class issues This method of translation has been in u se across France because it is a perfect way of shunning certain expressions and trademarks found in the films. This involves actors replacing vulgar words with a softer language expression that will not be offensive to the viewers. These would include advertisements on alcohol, drugs, and certain brand names like coca cola trademarks. The elites and professionals within the social group AB prefer subtitles and original versions to those in the lower social ranks who prefer dubbed films. However, it is true that one would go for the method he or she came across at an earlier stage of life, this is particularly true with French citizens. Subtitle movies have not had commanding support because most common citizens prefer dubbed version. Attitude has also played a crucial role in French movie industry in the sense that most citizensââ¬â¢ views dubbing as a way of preserving their culture and nationalism, as opposed to those shown in foreign languages (Danan 1991, p. 611).Advertising Looking for research paper on art and design? Let's see if we can help you! Get your first paper with 15% OFF Learn More Literacy Studies show that international students from nations dominated with subtitles like Scandinavians and Dutch learning English have always outperformed students from countries dominated with dubbed movies, of these France and Germany students are the majority. Literacy improves in countries consuming subtitling movies, for it promotes foreign language comprehension, as opposed to dubbing (Koolstra and Beentjes 1999, p. 51). Subtitle and the original versions would not only help the viewers learn foreign languages but also help in learning proper pronunciation; this would improve learning skills of a person (Danan 2004, p. 67). Dubbing, on the other hand, has promoted the French people to embrace a culture of people who do not want to read and learn other peopleââ¬â¢s traditions and customs (Pettit 2004, p. 25; Heiss 2004, p. 208) . Reference List Bogucki, L. 2004.The constraint of relevance in subtiting. The Journal of Spedialised Translation 1 Web. Available from: jostrans.org/issue01/artuckes/boguckien.htm . Cattrysse, P. 2004. Stories Travelling Across Nations and Cultures. META, 49(1), pp. 39-51 Web. Available from: erudit.org/revue/meta/2004/v49/n1/009018ar.html . Christine, H. 2004. Dubbing Multilingual Films: A New Challenge? META, 49(1), pp.208-220 Web. Available from: erudit.org/revue/meta/2004/v49/n1/009035ar.html . Danan, M. 1991. Dubbing as an Expression of Nationalism. Meta: Translators Journal, 36(4), pp. 606ââ¬â614 Web. Available from: erudit.org/revue/meta/1991/v36/n4/002446ar.pdf . Danan, M. 2004. Captioning and subtitling: undervalued Language learning Strategies. Meta: Translators Journal, 49(1), pp. 67-77 Web. Available from: erudit.org/revue/meta/2004/v49/n1/009021ar.html .Advertising We will write a custom research paper sample on The history of Dubbing in France specificall y for you for only $16.05 $11/page Learn More European Commission 2007. Effects on the European Economy of Shortage of foreign Language skills in Enterprise Web. Available from: http://europa.eu/rapid/pressReleasesAction.do?reference=MEMO/07/79format=HTMLaged=0language=ENguiLanguage=fr . Heiss, C. 2004. Dubbing Multilingual Films: A New Challenge? META, 49(1), pp.208-220 Web. Available from: erudit.org/revue/meta/2004/v49/n1/009035ar.html . Koolstra, C.M. and Beentjes, W.J. 1999. Childrens vocabulary acquisition in a foreign language through watching subtitled television programs at home. Educational Technology Research and Development, 47(1), pp. 51-60 Web. Available from: springerlink.com/content/7951541774721423/ . Pettit, Z. 2004. The Audio-Visual Text: Subtitling and Dubbing Different Genres. META, 49(1), pp. 25-28 Web. Available from: erudit.org/revue/meta/2004/v49/n1/009017ar.html . Riggio, F. 2010. Dubbing vs. Subtitling Web. Available from: 1stoptr.com/adm in/UpImage/Dubbing_vs_Subtitling.pdf .
Monday, October 21, 2019
Family in the Media Today Essay Example
Family in the Media Today Essay Example Family in the Media Today Essay Example Family in the Media Today Essay Example The media has been credited with spreading numerous ideologies that have shaped the definition of life both in the United States and beyond. This means that the media in one way or another is a reflection of the societal norms as perceived and believed by the people. While some people would argue that the media shapes the thoughts of the people, it is evidently arguable that the society is reflected upon by the media. The media has to be able to sell and to do this; they must appeal to the audience by being relevant in whatever they do. Television Illustrating Family The fact that the media industry has grown in leaps and bounds over the decades implies that they have so far been doing the right thing. This only ascertains that the media is a reflection of the society such that whatever ideas are prevailing in the media must be the ideas that prevail within a given society. Over the years, the American media has undergone a number of changes with regards to their presentation of the family. Initially, families comprised of loving parents and obedient children. The father figures back then may have been, in some cases, unorthodox so to speak, but they loved and provided for their families to the best of their abilities. The mothers, on the other hand, were always the loving and caring kind, with unlimited patience and enough good advice to go around. Today, however, the typical family as represented in the American media is flawed with all sorts of challenges. Most programs even go ahead to show broken homes with divorced parents and fights about child support and custody among other things. The question thus stands is whether it is the society that has changed or simply the media has adapted a different perspective on the concept of the family. This paper will argue that the society has changed and that todayââ¬â¢s families are not like those that our parents were brought up in. The media thus simply reflects on what the society has become, and the evident changes with regards to how families are presented can actually be traced back to the real life settings in todayââ¬â¢s families. This paper will be based on a number of secondary sources on how the media has been representing families over the past couple of decades. The Media as a Reflection of the Society In ââ¬Å"The Changing Face of the American Familyâ⬠, Tim Stanley explores the phases that the American media has taken the definition of family. At first, the family as shown in The Cosby Show was a situation in which the father was the head of the family and had to remain unchallenged by the rest of the members. In this show, the media clearly stepped out of the societal norm of love and acceptance regardless of the actions or circumstances into a zone where the father knew best and was thus always right. While it could be argued that the media instilled this type of parenting in the American population, it would be insincere to say that the attitude came from the media. It was a strict form of parenting that did exist but was considered traditional since the media was showing more of liberal methods of parenting and definitions of the family as a shelter of love and acceptance. The family in this 1984 sitcom is a loving family headed by a working father who wants the best for his family (Stanley 9). This is in more ways than one a perfect family, where everyone lives by the rules, and in the end, they are all happy. ââ¬Å"When Is Mommy Coming Home? A Content Analysis of Spillover in Parenthoodâ⬠by Barbara Prince considers the effects of modern day parenting on the children and on the parents as well. In the article, the author cites that as children watch more TV and parents spend more time at work, the life as shown in the media is becoming more realistic than not. The study uses the TV series Parenthood to prove this fact, with the help of real research on working parents and their families. In this study, it is established that the story in Parenthood actually happens in the lives of the American people today. This simply means that while parents are out working, the children have to be entertained with stories that they can actually relate to. The media thus plays to the experiences of their audiences just so they can make profits and get good ratings. Basically, the media in this case is useful in mirroring the society and giving the people a version of the truth as they know it (Pri nce 32). Parenthood is a TV series that shows just how parents live their lives, trying to balance work and family and often failing at one if not both. This show presents a modern day family where parenting is inadequate in all senses of the word. ââ¬Å"A Modern Family: The Performance of Family and Familialism in Contemporary Television Seriesâ⬠by Jennifer M. Fogel speaks of a devotion to protect the conservative image of the family even when the definition does not work so well in real life. The media is seen to bring out the undertones of conservativeness, unconditional love and comfort within the nuclear family as well as some kind of restricted mannerism that indicates an inclination towards perfection. While this author argues that the media today represents the consciousness of the society with regards to how people would like a family to be, she also contends to the idea that the TV shows often bend towards reality by giving the story as it should be (Fogel). This could possibly be because the shows need to appeal to the audience by being relevant to their experiences, and they should be able to somehow relate to the actors. This article argues that while the families in todayââ¬â¢s media are mostly flawed wi th too much drama and conflicts, they have some subconscious undertones of the old-time families. This may be a way of showing that even in the changing face of the social construction of a family, the initial foundations of unconditional love, comfort and some level of conservativeness remain intact, even if only with a light touch. In Beneath Family Role Portrayals: An Additional Measure of Communication Influence Using Time Series Analyses of Turn at Talk on a Popular Television Program by James Honeycutt, Lynn Wellman and Mary Larson, the authors contend that the TV programs are used to teach families about communication among other things. The authors argue that while these programs have to be appealing and relevant to the audience, if they are to get good ratings, they are often used in such a way that they are also informative and educative to the audience by applying a lot of relevant techniques. This function of the media is found in the fact that families spend more time watching TV than having actual conversations, and thus it is important for them to find some useful lessons in the media. This article brings out the possibility that the media shapes the lives of the people, but it can also be understood to imply that the media is tailored to suit the needs of the audience (Honeycutt, Lynn and Larson 5 4). In a case where the media is used to teach communication to the families, it must have been that the families have been found wanting in the way that they communicate with each other. This would imply that the needs of the family are established before the media is used to meet these needs. In this way, the needs of the society shape the actions of the media. All these articles and studies agree to the idea that the media is only a reflection of the society with regards to what people believe, or want to believe. The media thrives on the ability to make sales and impress the audience, and it is thus compelled to be relevant to the audience in whatever subject they choose to pursue. In one way or another, the media is defined by the society such that whatever is seen in the media and accepted by the masses is a true reflection of what the society considers as normal and right. The thoughts and opinions reflected in the American TV shows are thus a representation of the attitudes of people with regards to the subject in question. Family in the Media In the past, the family was defined as a haven of perfection. It was all about keeping up appearances, obeying the elders and basically playing by the rules. The children were expected to do right by their parents while parents were always right. Generally, the society created a notion that family equaled perfection, and it is no wonder that it was considered as a pivotal aspect in defining individuals. In one way or another, the family was a great place to be, and every member of the society was groomed to be a part of this once they became adults. Rather than striving to attain happiness, people lived to start families and be ââ¬Ëperfectââ¬â¢ as families had come to be defined (Neuhaus 770). Perfection was the key aspect, and no one wanted to be left out. At the same time, however, people had to deal with other pressures including working and being parents. As a result, these pressures, especially amongst the working families, may have contributed to the change in the family configuration. Gradually, families became conflicting with numerous flaws and kinks that tainted the notion of perfection and thus the ideal family crumbled to pieces. As the idea of perfection was swept away by the constraints of modern living along with the need to adopt modernist attitudes, the family was strained with family ties being put to the test and often crumbling under extreme pressures. The masses stopped associating families with perfection and rather began to accept the challenges that were experienced in daily living. This is what the new definition of a family became: a unit that has flaws and challenges but often stuck together at the end of it, all due to understanding and loyalty. This new definition was thus embraced and propagated by the media too as it suited all the different circumstances that families had to go through. There were instances of betrayal by family, conflicting loyalties, forgiveness and sometimes lifelong rifts that became irreconcilable. These experiences eventually dictated the definition of a normal family in the American society. Initially, family shows were those like The Cosby Show, with perfect families where the father was a good provider struggling to make ends meet, the mother a homemaker with a social life and the children all trying to be rebellious and yet respectful and obedient to their parents. However, as this situation changed, the shows also changed. From the perfect families, TV shows started embracing the changes in reality too by presenting families that in any way could not be considered perfect. There came shows such as My Wife and Kids, The War at Home, The Modern Family among others. All these shows present an image that can be considered more realistic based on the family setting today. While often sticking to the concept of a nuclear family, these shows bring out the conflicts in both the nuclear and extended settings. In The War at Home, the nuclear family has numerous challenges, and the children are in their teenage years. Then there is a younger aunt who adds on to the drama and co nflicts in the story (Kosovski and Smith 854). Generally, the story revolves around the drama that a normal family goes through, implying that normalcy in a family setting is all about being true to oneself and often communicating in such a way that one is transparent and yet accommodating of the other members. Considering the media as a mirror of the society, it can be stated that the image of a family as portrayed in the media today is a result of the social constructs on the family as developed gradually over the years. The more parents became drawn away from their families in search of financial stability and successful career paths, the more the fabric of the family unit as defined by the society became torn and in some cases irreparable (Brancato 55). In addition, for some reason, there came a time when the number of children born out of wedlock, often to unwed mothers, spiked. These single-parent families further contributed to the questioning of the definition of a family. As different opinions on the subject surfaced, more and more changes became evident with regards to the social norms. People started seeing the family in a more realistic light where the parents may not always be present, they would not always be on good terms, and the children would not always be as obedient. The se became the norms of family life as defined by the society, implying that the even the moral fabric was changing and that it was okay for parents to have differences and for children to stand up for themselves from time to time. The media as we know it today is a means through which the society speaks out, expressing the various opinions and attitudes towards a variety of issues. In an ideal world, the media is an exact reflection of the people and their thoughts and beliefs. The world may be far from ideal today, but the media remains steadfast in its role as a mirror of society. Even with the manipulation of the corporate sector, the media still has to conform to the ideals of the society in order to get good ratings and sell their brands. This is why most media houses strive to air programs that are relevant and informative to their audiences without being boring. The entertainment is fused with education and realistic representation with the purpose of reflecting what the society would consider as acceptable. Initially, the family was a picture-perfect setting, but there came too much pressure with modernization and globalization that changed this picture. People thus needed to see programs that reflecte d the real family settings and spoke to their situations. Their experiences needed to be reflected by the media houses, and these houses saw the need and met it. It is for this reason that the TV shows also had to change and embrace a more realistic outlook that is both modernist and constructionist with regards to the norms and values as dictated by the society.
Sunday, October 20, 2019
Qu necesitas saber sobre visa paralizada causa 221g
Qu necesitas saber sobre visa paralizada causa 221g Cada aà ±o, aproximadamente la solicitud de un millà ³n de visas americanas, tanto no inmigrante como migrantes, entran en un periodo de anlisis especial conocido como procedimiento administrativo 221g, el cual significa que, por un tiempo,à no son ni aprobadas ni denegadas y la decisià ³n final est pendiente. En este artà culo se informa en detalle sobre quà © es realmente el procedimiento administrativo 221g, por quà © sucede, quà © puede hacer el solicitante de la visa y cunto tiempo se demora la obtencià ³n de una respuesta final y definitiva. Puntos clave: Procedimiento administrativo 221g El procedimiento administrativo 221g es una paralizacià ³n temporal de la solicitud de una visa americana. No es una aprobacià ³n ni tampoco una denegacià ³n.Las causas del procedimiento administrativo 221g son variadas: falta de documentacià ³n, necesidad de verificar antecedentes de solicitantes, veracidad de declaraciones en solicitud de visa, etc.Es habitual que la resolucià ³n del procedimiento administrativo 221g se demore 60 dà as o menos, pero se conocen casos de demora superior a 8 meses. à ¿Quà © significa el procedimiento administrativo 221g? Cuando el solicitante de una visa americana recibe una notificacià ³n en la que se le informa que su solicitud est pendiente por razà ³n del procedimiento administrativo 221g, debe entender que eso quiere decir que despuà ©s de la entrevista para la visa el oficial consular a cargoà no ha podido tomar una decisià ³n definitiva. En otras palabras, la visa no es aprobada pero tampoco negada definitivamente, sino que pasa a una tramitacià ³n especial que se conoce como procedimiento administrativo 221g. à ¿Por quà © la solicitud de una visa es enviada a un procedimiento administrativo? Las razones pueden ser bsicamente dos: En primer lugar, porque falta documentacià ³n para la visa. En este caso, el oficial consular informar en detalle sobre quà © documentos se precisan y cà ³mo deben ser enviados al consulado una vez que se obtengan. En estos casos es importantà simo tener en cuenta que hay un plazo que se especifica para proveer esa informacià ³n. Luego de ese tiempo sin haber entregado la documentacià ³n, la peticià ³n de visa es cancelada y si se desea sacar la visa se tendr que volver a aplicar desde el principio. Y, en segundo lugar, el procedimiento administrativo 221g puede darse por cualquier otra razà ³n. Desde coincidencia en nombre y fecha de nacimiento con otra persona, a informacià ³n variada que pueda tener el consulado y que necesita contrastar antes de tomar una decisià ³n.à Otro ejemplo puede suceder cuando quien solicita la visa ha sido militar en un paà s considerado como no amistoso. Tambià ©n en el caso de personas que solicitan la visa y que han visitado o residido en paà ses considerados como no amigos de los Estados Unidos. Incluso este problema le puede surgir a empresarios, inversores y cientà ficos de algà ºn modo relacionados con tecnologà a considerada sensible o de doble uso y que est incluida en laà Technology Alert List. Pero en la mayorà a de los casos se trata de asuntos ms comunes, como cuando se sospecha criminalidad por parte del solicitante de la visa o cuando se precisa que una oficina dependiente del gobierno federal de los Estados Unidos realice verificaciones. Por ejemplo, cuando se sospecha que uno de los documentos presentados al aplicar por la visa es falso o lo es alguna de las declaraciones y afirmaciones realizadas en las planillas para su solicitud. Hay que tener siempre presente que las mentiras en este contexto son fraude de ley y puede tener consecuencias muy serias con respecto a las opciones para obtener la visa americana. à ¿Cunto tiempo se demora resolver el procedimiento administrativo 221g? Cada caso es un mundo y no se puede establecer una regla general. Si bien es cierto que en la mayorà a de los casos hay una respuesta definitiva antes de que pasen 60 dà as, se sabe de casos en los que la demora ha llegado a los ocho meses o ms. Si la demora es mayor a lo habitual, debe consultar con un abogado si procede demandar mediante un writ of mandamus. à ¿En quà © consiste el procedimiento administrativo 221g? En cuanto a en quà © consiste este trmite administrativo 221g, hay dos posibles respuestas. Por un lado puede simplemente consistir en conseguir la documentacià ³n que se necesita y no se ha presentado. En este caso el consulado entrega un papel que dice detalladamente quà © documentacià ³n falta y dà ³nde y cà ³mo se debe entregar. En este caso debe seguir al pie de la letra esas instrucciones. Pero, por otro lado, puede que el trmite consista en una investigacià ³n por parte de una oficina que de algà ºn modo depende de un organismo federal de los Estados Unidos. Por ejemplo, se pueden verificar los antecedentes penales del solicitante o que realmente trabaja donde dice que lo hace. Incluso se puede enviar a un investigador a verificar la realidad de un matrimonio, etc. En este caso la tramitacià ³n va a depender del tipo de problema que se intenta resolver. à ¿Puede pedirse una tramitacià ³n de urgencia de la visa en este caso? No. Es irrelevante que se quiera la visa para empezar un curso, asistir a una boda, cerrar un negocio, etc. o que ya se hubiera pagado el viaje y el boleto de avià ³n. En ningà ºn caso es posible solicitar una tramitacià ³n de urgencia. Por esta razà ³n se recomienda encarecidamente no comprar tickets ni pagar reservas de viajes antes de tener la visa en mano. à ¿Puede verificarse cà ³mo se encuentra el caso? Si se ha solicitado una visa no inmigrante, tipo turista, estudiante, intercambio, trabajo temporal o semejantes se puede acceder a informacià ³n ms bien generalista sobre el estado de la tramitacià ³n de la visa en la pgina oficial del Departamento de Estado habilitada para ello. Si en el papel que se entrega donde se comunica que la solicitud est en trmite administrativo 221g se indica un mà ©todo distinto de verificacià ³n, debe seguir esas indicaciones. Si se quiere recibir informacià ³n ms en detalle, se aconseja contactar al consulado o embajada que tramita la visa. En estos casos es altamente recomendable dejar transcurrir al menos dos meses desde la fecha de la entrevista al momento de contactar por primera vez por esta razà ³n. Si se trata del supuesto en el que pidieron documentacià ³n adicional, debe contar los sesenta dà as a partir de la fecha del envà o de dicha documentacià ³n. à ¿Quà © sucede cuando se llega a una solucià ³n definitiva? La visa puede ser aprobada o negada. En este à ºltimo caso, se notificar la causa. En ambos supuestosà se enviar el pasaporte a su titular por el procedimiento que sea habitual en el consulado donde se solicità ³ la visa. El consulado puede negar la aprobacià ³n de una visa por razones que caen en dos grandes categorà as: Por causa de ineligibilidad, que es la ms comà ºn y aplica solamente a las visas no inmigrantes, como la de turista, estudiante, inversià ³n, intercambio, etc., o por alguna deà lasà causas de inadmisibilidadà que impiden el ingreso a Estados Unidos, y que aplican tanto a las visas no inmigrante como de las de migrante. Cuantoà sucede una causa de inadmisibilidad, a veces es posible pedir un perdà ³n, tambià ©n conocido como waiver o permiso. Sin embargo, en estos casos es recomendable consultar con un abogado porque son casos difà ciles y no siempre es posible. Consejos en forma de tests Se aconseja tomar este quiz oà test de respuestas mà ºltiples en el caso de solicitar una visa no inmigrante. Conocer las respuestas le ayudar a entender cà ³mo sacar una visa, conservarla, renovarla y evitar que la cancelen.à En el caso de que el interà ©s sea obtener una visa inmigrante, es de interà ©s tomar este test sobre conocimientos bsicos de la green card, tambià ©n conocida como tarjeta de residencia permanente o green card. Este es un artà culo informativo. No es asesorà a legal.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)